Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 700 G1 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 700 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 8027
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '16 at 08:22
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 346
44% 335 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Sapphire(174B E151) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.36% Terrible
Lighting 7.73
Reflection 8.81
Parallax 6.09
6% 7.54 fps
MRender 8.38
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 9.52
6% 7.69 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.36%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA7C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 97.7
Write 115
Mixed 108
81% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.19
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.12
47% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 103%
WD WD1600BJKT-75F4T0 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 80.7
Write 74.4
Mixed 79
59% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.34
101% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.M8F Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 700 G1 MT Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 700 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback