Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	44.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160804
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '19 at 10:25
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 1,417 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 99.8 2-Core 175 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 795 70% 597 Pts	64-Core 1,567 97% 1,567 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22F1) CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Lighting 70.2 Reflection 69.6 Parallax 88.3 57% 76 fps	MRender 72.5 Gravity 72.2 Splatting 58.3 54% 67.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 350 305 351 372 343 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 415 Write 448 Mixed 307 SusWrite 354 86% 381 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 87.7 4K Mixed 36.7 137% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 149 157% 257 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 102%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 7,666 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 31GB free Firmware: JKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 105 104 115 119 114 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 116 Write 119 Mixed 58.4 SusWrite 112 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 70%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 47GB free Firmware: MJ8O SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 73 78 84 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 78 Write 71.2 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 75.5 43% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 67GB free Firmware: MJ8O SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 82 84 86 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 74 Write 94.1 Mixed 11 SusWrite 84.9 48% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 89%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 69GB free Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 83 63 66 97 60 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 115 Write 102 Mixed 92.8 SusWrite 71.8 71% 95.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 67%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 129 Write 133 Mixed 32.2 71% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 82%
Hup72202 0APA330 2TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 102GB free Firmware: JKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 68 74 75 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	40% Average	Read 69.6 Write 72.8 Mixed 40.2 SusWrite 69.7 46% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 61%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB 1,175 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1607 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.6 6 6.2 6.1 6 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	4.34% Terrible	Read 14.7 Write 6 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 5.7 10% 8.28 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.34% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 48GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69.7% Good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 24 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 18.8 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	157x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	103x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	56x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	42x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	19x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x

RAM
CL15-15-15 D4-2133 2x8GBUnknownBench 68%, 1,169 samples	12x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 78%, 415 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363