Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory44.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '19 at 10:25
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 175
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 795
70% 597 Pts
64-Core 1,567
97% 1,567 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1365 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Lighting 70.2
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 88.3
57% 76 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 58.3
54% 67.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 350 305 351 372 343 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 415
Write 448
Mixed 307
SusWrite 354
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 36.7
137% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 149
157% 257 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
31GB free
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 105 104 115 119 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 116
Write 119
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 112
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
47GB free
Firmware: MJ8O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 73 78 84 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44% Average
Read 78
Write 71.2
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 75.5
43% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
67GB free
Firmware: MJ8O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 82 84 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 74
Write 94.1
Mixed 11
SusWrite 84.9
48% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 89%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
69GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 83 63 66 97 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 115
Write 102
Mixed 92.8
SusWrite 71.8
71% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 67%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
4GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 129
Write 133
Mixed 32.2
71% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 82%
Hup72202 0APA330 2TB
102GB free
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 68 74 75 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40% Average
Read 69.6
Write 72.8
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 69.7
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40%
Great: 61%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB
4GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.6 6 6.2 6.1 6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.34% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 6
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5.7
10% 8.28 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.34%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.7% Good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 24
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback