HP ENVY m6 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP ENVY m6 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18A5
Memory10.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '16 at 20:00
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 152
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 210
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 18A5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.05 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 240GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSBG200 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 500
Write 360
Mixed 155
74% 338 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 22.8
74% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 79.2
81% 132 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 90%
ASMT 2105 120GB
28GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 239
Write 224
Mixed 227
295% 230 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 10.9
1,160% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 17.5
DQ Write 25.8
DQ Mixed 9.27
1,257% 17.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 153%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F CT102464BF160B.C16 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY m6 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY m6 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback