ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20131114
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '15 at 22:58
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 116 2-Core 232 79% 174 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 452 61% 454 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 54% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2872) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4475 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Lighting 25.8 Reflection 24.4 Parallax 30.4 21% 26.8 fps	MRender 32.5 Gravity 23.9 Splatting 25.2 22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160 11,787 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 112 70119222 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 70394513990162 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1527 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 360 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 29 52 42953080861 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 70119222 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 70119222 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 70119222 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10429 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8918 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8918 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9114	52.7% Above average	Read 487 Write 126 Mixed 187 58% 267 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 68.6 4K Mixed 9.62 78% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 24.2 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 12.1 28% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 81%
HPT DISK 0_0 6TB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 925GB free Firmware: 4.00 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 11.3 Write 39.4 Mixed 51.5 26% 34 MB/s	4K Read 2.71 4K Write 0.36 4K Mixed 0.19 141% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 236GB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 8297832 (03) Spinup time 95 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2458 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 57 54 73022874899 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5676 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1140 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 95 1769507 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 42 189651025960 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 364 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 16641 (C2) HDA temperature 40 58 42949673000 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 33659658701253 (F1) Unknown 100 253 5321908423 (F2) Unknown 100 253 6773634973	55.9% Above average	Read 110 Write 84.7 Mixed 79.7 68% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.95 4K Mixed 0.22 99% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 454GB free Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 236447744 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2286 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 60 34384436239 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 6035 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1029 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 327706 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 46 9228714019 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 271 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 86 86 28882 (C2) HDA temperature 35 54 -140737488355293 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 49727131356356 (F1) Unknown 100 253 11567842790 (F2) Unknown 100 253 12590683902	89.6% Excellent	Read 160 Write 152 Mixed 142 114% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.32 96% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 114%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 74GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 76.9 Write 98.1 Mixed 69.4 107% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 9.05 4K Mixed 0.37 323% 3.38 MB/s	DQ Read 1.09 DQ Write 6.44 DQ Mixed 0.29 233% 2.61 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-Z77-D3H Builds (Compare 1,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	632x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	408x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	252x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	124x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	104x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	48x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	48x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	50x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples	46x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $247

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback