Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime11.7 Days
Run DateJan 17 '19 at 11:31
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 200
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 621
60% 492 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.6% Poor
Lighting 28
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 31
23% 30.9 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 30
Splatting 19.4
22% 28.2 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
587GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 129 129 134 138 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 140
Write 77
Mixed 31
SusWrite 132
69% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 25A3 2TB
131GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 35.8
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 10.4
37% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15%
Great: 59%
WD Elements 2TB
272GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 33.5
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 12.2
36% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.6 9.8 9.5 9.7 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 34.5
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 9.8
34% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 2TB
673GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 9.9 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 4.2
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 10.1
18% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,488 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback