Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H

Performance Results

Gaming 21%
Desktop 78%
Workstation 19%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H410M S2H  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '22 at 08:07
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 69.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 232
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 614
62% 506 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Asus(1043 054F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1187 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 36.8
19% 29.1 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 20
19% 23.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
General USB Flash Disk 248GB
84GB free
Firmware: 1100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 274 358 267 330 331 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 274
Write 292
Mixed 220
SusWrite 320
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 11.7
55% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 54
DQ Mixed 16.2
18% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 54%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$24
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 49 69 67 83 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 94.2
Write 90.9
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 70
52% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2727 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 24.5
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 26.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H410M S2H Builds (Compare 2,640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 65%
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 59%

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $402
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback