Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory124.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 09:54
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4114T
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 181
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 682
61% 518 Pts
64-Core 2,209
137% 2,209 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 400
Nvidia(10DE 0893) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.05% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 3.77
Parallax 1.12
2% 2.51 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 1.91
2% 2.36 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.05%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE510T 256GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0213A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 539 766 766 766 764 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,488
Write 47.4
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 607
120% 557 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 13.3
84% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 590
DQ Write 47.1
DQ Mixed 17.5
89% 218 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 135%
Great: 186%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 12 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 47.2
MC Mixed 32.1
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback