User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault Default string
MotherboardColorful C.A320M-K PRO
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 19:19
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 108
2-Core 224
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 428
60% 445 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.8
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 18.6
12% 15.9 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 18.6
12% 13.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HCS5C3232SLA380 320GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST2OA38B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 21 54 54 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 69.1
Write 55.8
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 43
37% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback