HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 20:19
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$81
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 466
50% 395 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 39.9
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 38.8
32% 37 fps
MRender 47
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 37
33% 40.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 40 56 52 47 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 98.3
Write 100
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 49.8
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
109GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 165 164 164 164 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 160
Mixed 104
SusWrite 164
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 26 25 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 21.9
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 25
18% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.6
189% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB Corsair CMX8GX3M1A1333C9 Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 32GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback