Intel NUC7i5BNB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemIntel NUC7i5BNH
MotherboardIntel NUC7i5BNB  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '19 at 21:30
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 146
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 283
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2068) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4944
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
9.18% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 10.3
9% 10.4 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 9.93
Splatting 15
10% 12 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.18%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
562GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 284 288 286 303 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 448
Write 226
Mixed 279
SusWrite 298
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 24.4
95% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 67.4
DQ Mixed 172
127% 175 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 133%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
322GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 226 142 175 206 212 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 358
Write 326
Mixed 302
SusWrite 215
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 17.7
58% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 32.5
41% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 99%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 12 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 36.6
Write 26.1
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 14.4
31% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 5
470% 6.07 MB/s
DQ Read 8.2
DQ Write 9.7
DQ Mixed 3.9
493% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.8% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 17.7
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 8.4
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC7i5BNB Builds (Compare 430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC7i5BNB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback