Asrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '19 at 01:57
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 793
71% 600 Pts
64-Core 1,091
68% 1,091 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.5% Average
Lighting 62.5
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 84.4
51% 70.3 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 52.2
47% 57.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GB
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 437 322 251 251 251 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 409
Write 445
Mixed 367
SusWrite 316
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 36.7
130% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 296
221% 292 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 97%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
367GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 77 64 64 63 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 49.5
Write 93.5
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 69
49% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.5
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 71%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
597GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 109 108 110 113 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 64.8
Write 105
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 109
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
180% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 71%
ST500VT000-1DK14 500GB
348GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.9% Below average
Read 88.2
Write 92.8
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 101
114% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown? CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 35.4
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 29.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac - $142

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback