Today's hottest deals

Powerspec 1510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemPowerspec 1510  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo 1510
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '19 at 04:01
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 107
50% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 295
32% 252 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 65A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.5% Poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 66.5
8% 29.3 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 73.8
56% 67.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 603 626 710 767 760 713 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,148
Write 708
Mixed 591
SusWrite 697
175% 786 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 29
102% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 279
209% 276 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 132%
Great: 541%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 113 111 110 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 66.7
Write 77.5
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 112
57% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 68%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 107 109 107 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 46
Write 70.3
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 108
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68.5% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 25.5
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1510 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Powerspec 1510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback