Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Memory 46.7 1-Core 44.8 2-Core 88.7 36% 60.1 Pts	4-Core 172 8-Core 176 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2067) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6229 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.02 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 0.04 1% 1.75 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GB 6,836 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0410A SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 305 314 313 300 283 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	80% Very good	Read 364 Write 308 Mixed 308 SusWrite 305 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 36.2 117% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 131 124% 196 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unde TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 1x4GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 8.1 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	127x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	124x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	3x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	8x

RAM
99U5469-045.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 43%, 788 samples	11x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	6x
99U5469-045.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 22%, 1,714 samples	5x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16