Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire M5810  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FMP55
Memory10.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100329
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 23 '16 at 12:28
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 142
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 262
37% 272 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Asus(1043 8365) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.14% Terrible
Lighting 9.43
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 7.91
8% 9.52 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 10
Splatting 10.7
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.14%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.3% Above average
Read 268
Write 213
Mixed 217
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 28.1
82% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 71.6
79% 135 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$36
594GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 91.9
Mixed 106
76% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.33
104% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 62%
WD Elements 1078 750GB
688GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 22.1
Mixed 19.1
28% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.19
59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VS2GB1333D4 Toshiba 99U5584-005.A00LF Toshiba 9905402-534.A00LF Toshiba 9905402-416.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5810 Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire M5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback