Today's hottest deals

Foxconn G31MXP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardFoxconn G31MXP  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090513
Uptime9.3 Days
Run DateJul 24 '16 at 21:11
Run Duration399 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 47.4
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 68.4
32% 50.4 Pts
4-Core 45.3
8-Core 76.5
7% 60.9 Pts
64-Core 51.7
3% 51.7 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 605
Sapphire(174B 0605) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6822
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.11 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 0.74
1% 1.29 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$26
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 88.6
Mixed 83
65% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.31
64% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 69%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 28.3
Mixed 29.1
38% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.24
68% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 56%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
860GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 28.9
Mixed 30.9
39% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.19
39% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 59%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00MVLB1 4TB
496GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.5% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 28.3
Mixed 27.1
37% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.23
81% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 21%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
375GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 27.3
Mixed 28
37% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.15
56% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 34%
WD 1200BEVExternal 120GB
85GB free, PID 0702
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 28.3
Mixed 29.8
38% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.31
73% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
12.7% Very poor
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 4.5
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G31MXP Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn G31MXP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback