Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 2516CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 2516CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2516CTO
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101025
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 28 '19 at 13:04
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 620
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 132
56% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 170
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 215A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.66
0% 0.75 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 205 204 207 202 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.9% Above average
Read 223
Write 212
Mixed 199
SusWrite 203
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 33
81% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 179
134% 178 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
931GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 160 160 157 158 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.7% Above average
Read 216
Write 209
Mixed 210
SusWrite 159
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 22.7
79% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 180
134% 177 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 029E CM3X4GSD1066 8GB
1334, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.9% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.5
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2516CTO Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2516CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback