Today's hottest deals

Asus 1015E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus 1015E  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1015E
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '19 at 15:29
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 847-$259
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 22.5
2-Core 56.8
35% 49.7 Pts
4-Core 53.7
8-Core 53.4
7% 53.6 Pts
64-Core 56.8
4% 56.8 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 115D) 773MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.42 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.65
1% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 34 54 64 60 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 69.6
Write 60.9
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 48.1
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF25664HZ-1G6K 1 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1015E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus 1015E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback