Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 LE  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111027
Uptime7 Days
Run DateJan 28 '19 at 19:48
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 189
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 467
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 31.8
31% 35.2 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 33.8
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 128 119 119 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 207
Write 196
Mixed 183
SusWrite 127
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 27
103% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 160
123% 167 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 85%
WD WD4500HLHX-01JJPV0 450GB
207GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 123 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 131
Write 123
Mixed 85
SusWrite 124
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.4
267% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-002.A00LF 9905403-432.A00LF 99U5458-002.A00LF 9905403-432.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback