Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE C855-1PP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C855-1PP  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '19 at 20:21
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B830
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
44% Average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 40
2-Core 41.8
41% 54.8 Pts
4-Core 33.1
8-Core 87.2
7% 60.1 Pts
64-Core 79.1
5% 79.1 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB30) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.91
1% 0.98 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.46 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S100E-120GB 120GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0127C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 333 251 205 185 277 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 221
Write 213
Mixed 149
SusWrite 254
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 5.6
42% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 91.9
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 12.1
34% 72 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5469-041.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.8% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C855-1PP Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C855-1PP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback