Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140108
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 27 '16 at 16:44
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 117
54% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 188
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3788
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 20.4
18% 20.1 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 17.2
17% 21 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 128GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 458
Write 229
Mixed 199
65% 295 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 20.1
76% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 53.6
57% 95.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
1TB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 130
Write 116
Mixed 160
103% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.15
63% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R538G1601U2S- Corsair CMX4GX3M1A160 Corsair CMX4GX3M1A160 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.3
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-D3H Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback