Today's hottest deals

Shuttle SN78S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemShuttle SN78S  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle FN78S
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090714
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateJul 29 '16 at 06:35
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9850
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 36.6
2-Core 72.6
42% 61.6 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 140
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8200
Device(1297 3139) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4195
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.33% Terrible
Lighting 0.17
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.09
0% 0.43 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 0.83
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.33%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD0064P1 64GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5FAM011 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 229
Write 177
Mixed 157
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 3.22
40% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 10.8
DQ Write 32.8
DQ Mixed 3.55
8% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 32%
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50
163GB free
Firmware: GT001L Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 66.3
Mixed 10.8
35% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.33
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 48%
Samsung SP1604N 152GB
88GB free
Firmware: TM100-30 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 50.8
Write 14.1
Mixed 25.2
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.31
72% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20.2% Poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SN78S Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Shuttle SN78S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback