Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory102 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '19 at 19:32
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 906
81% 684 Pts
64-Core 1,343
83% 1,343 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.7% Very good
Lighting 97.5
Reflection 110
Parallax 92
79% 99.9 fps
MRender 92.4
Gravity 92.9
Splatting 97.1
77% 94.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 407 469 466 472 465 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 367
Mixed 348
SusWrite 454
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 44.4
157% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 42.2
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 53.3
80% 141 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
128GB free
Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1142 1225 1425 1417 1456 1448 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 779
Write 1,280
Mixed 922
SusWrite 1,352
246% 1,083 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 55.4
200% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 616
DQ Mixed 362
307% 437 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 197%
Great: 259%
H/W RAID 5 9TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 172 196 194 197 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 166
Write 181
Mixed 129
SusWrite 189
228% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
20% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 85%
H/W RAID 5 9TB
1.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 187 197 194 197 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 212
Write 195
Mixed 131
SusWrite 192
244% 183 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
19% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 84%
Lexar SD USB_3_0 Read 64GB
58GB free, PID b050
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 48 48 48 49 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 50.8
Write 16.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 48
53% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 5.1
321% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FB 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 52.3
MC Write 53.9
MC Mixed 45.6
145% 50.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 21.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback