Dell PowerEdge T20

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	73.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Dell PowerEdge T20
Motherboard	Dell PowerEdge T20 (all builds)
Memory	19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180208
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '19 at 23:09
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 187 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 74.3 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 155 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 433 44% 357 Pts	64-Core 445 28% 445 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.6% Very good	Lighting 86.7 Reflection 103 Parallax 102 71% 97.2 fps	MRender 94.3 Gravity 94.7 Splatting 99.5 79% 96.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 290 292 294 290 293 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 450 Write 298 Mixed 275 SusWrite 291 73% 328 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 78.2 4K Mixed 31.3 119% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 234 201% 297 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 129%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3TB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 155 154 154 155 154 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Read 153 Write 150 Mixed 92.2 SusWrite 155 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 0420 F3-1600C9-8GXM 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 0420 F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	45.7% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 14.6 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 13.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PowerEdge T20 Builds (Compare 219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T20

CPU
Xeon E3-1225 v3Intel $170Bench 69%, 4,850 samples	176x
Pentium G3220Intel $36Bench 48%, 19,337 samples	13x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	6x

GPU
HD Graphics P4600IntelBench 3%, 2,141 samples	52x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	10x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
Raid 0 Volume 256GBIntelBench 120%, 13,747 samples	8x

RAM
HMT451U7BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 30%, 163 samples	10x
HMT451U7BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 232 samples	7x
HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 56%, 2,366 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $270

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48