Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 10% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2500 APU 2,593 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Socket FT3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	21% Poor	Memory 35.4 1-Core 20.8 2-Core 38.7 21% 31.6 Pts	4-Core 40.6 8-Core 35.3 5% 37.9 Pts	64-Core 39.2 2% 39.2 Pts
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8240 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 2219) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.41% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 3.38 Parallax 1.78 1% 2.22 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.27 Splatting 2.61 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.41% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB 11,127 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 283GB free (System drive) Firmware: EC2ZB70B SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 35 36 32 45 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 82.6 Write 64 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 40 43% 58.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B2873FHS-CH9 2x1GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.04% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 1.8 7% 2.47 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 0.2 SC Mixed 0.3 1% 0.33 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.04% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-2500 APUAMDBench 21%, 2,593 samples	2x

GPU
HD 8240AMDBench 1%, 3,521 samples	2x

SSD
256GB SSD 256GBLexarBench 111%, 12,615 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	1x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 14,353 samples	1x