Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Hp-pavilion NY556AA-ABA e9260f (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI Indio
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100303
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '19 at 23:56
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	69% Good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 78.3 2-Core 142 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 270 36% 270 Pts	64-Core 267 16% 267 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.24% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 4.88 4% 4.79 fps	MRender 6.43 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.22 5% 5.52 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.24% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 184 140 131 140 140 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.8% Good	Read 236 Write 219 Mixed 221 SusWrite 157 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 34.1 104% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 196 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 51GB free Firmware: BBF2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 98 104 109 106 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 210 Write 138 Mixed 162 SusWrite 103 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 21.7 82% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 123 94% 125 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 73%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 20GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 12 9.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	8.41% Terrible	Read 28.1 Write 15.5 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 12.1 23% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0 21% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.41% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CD04CD04 RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 12.1 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	4x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	1x

RAM
HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBAD80AD80Bench 41%, 230 samples	2x
EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4x2GBFE02FE02Bench 38%, 699 samples	2x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $260

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16