Today's hottest deals

ECS A55F2-M4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS A55F2-M4  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 10:24
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400K APU-$81
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 53.1
2-Core 90.9
47% 72.5 Pts
4-Core 70.8
8-Core 95.2
10% 83 Pts
64-Core 98.6
6% 98.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V4800 (FireGL V)
HP(103C 2306) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1010
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 6.09
6% 7.52 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 9.09
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 55 44 45 54 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 41.5
Mixed 41.6
SusWrite 48.6
37% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
148GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 56 47 47 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 90.8
Write 91.8
Mixed 60
SusWrite 50.6
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.3% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55F2-M4 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A55F2-M4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback