Today's hottest deals

Asrock H81M-DG4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H81M-DG4  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '19 at 16:13
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 198
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 381
49% 368 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E257) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Lighting 0
Reflection 4.77
Parallax 5.38
0% 3.38 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 5.74
4% 4.54 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$70
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 36 46 41 38 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 17.5
Write 53.2
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 40.8
30% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 57%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
15GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 8.7 8.9 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 3.3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 9.2
10% 9.68 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.B1GEP.DF00C Hynix DMT451E6BFR8C-PB 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-DG4 Builds (Compare 390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-DG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback