Hp-pavilion AY603AA-ABA HPE-150f

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion AY603AA-ABA HPE-150f  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI IONA
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '16 at 17:36
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 70
2-Core 132
61% 98 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 306
32% 258 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61% Good
Lighting 76.1
Reflection 77.4
Parallax 66.5
62% 73.3 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 72.9
59% 72 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 256GB-$240
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.3% Above average
Read 261
Write 252
Mixed 258
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 17.2
77% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 11.7
13% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 111%
ST940811 4A 40GB
29GB free, PID 0501
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 27
Mixed 27.2
35% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.28
40% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AY603AA-ABA HPE-150f Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AY603AA-ABA HPE-150f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback