Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700T 9,225 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 86.7 2-Core 178 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 380 45% 349 Pts	64-Core 454 28% 454 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 M360 1,374 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(1B0A 90F3) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.1.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 4.44 3% 3.59 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 3.23 Splatting 5 4% 4.84 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPH3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 64 84 95 32 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 100 Write 102 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 66.6 59% 80 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 552GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 42 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 39.3 Write 38.5 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 41.1 51% 37.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 16GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.2% Above average	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 18.8 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 16.7 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16