Biostar H81MLV3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardBiostar H81MLV3  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '19 at 17:28
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 201
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 283
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 72.9
Reflection 75.5
Parallax 66.1
59% 71.5 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 71.8
58% 70.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5916
Write 4,345
Mixed 4,299
1,077% 4,853 MB/s
4K Read 486
4K Write 332
4K Mixed 379
1,398% 399 MB/s
DQ Read 623
DQ Write 1,488
DQ Mixed 822
693% 977 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
251GB free
Firmware: CC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 181
Write 101
Mixed 86.5
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT451E6MFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50% Above average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 15
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81MLV3 Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MLV3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $43
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback