Today's hottest deals

Asus GL553VE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL553VE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VE
Memory21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '19 at 10:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 216
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 505
50% 410 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 15E0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1735
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 40.2
33% 37.1 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 34.2
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 331 150 145 144 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 446
Write 427
Mixed 381
SusWrite 221
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 36
129% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 305
222% 285 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.3% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.1
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 10.7
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL553VE Builds (Compare 1,671 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback