Toshiba SATELLITE L750D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L750D  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Torpedo
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '19 at 21:04
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3400M APU
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 18.3
2-Core 45.9
30% 42.2 Pts
4-Core 75.2
8-Core 89.1
11% 82.1 Pts
64-Core 76.5
5% 76.5 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6520G
Toshiba(1179 FC50) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
2.63% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 2.56
3% 3.36 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 4.04
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.63%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 126 123 125 131 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.4% Average
Read 244
Write 200
Mixed 168
SusWrite 130
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 23.7
75% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 143
112% 154 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 93%
Generic- Multi-Card 2GB
1GB free, PID 0138
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 6.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 6.6
10% 8.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
27% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5773DH0-CH9 6GB
1334, 1334 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L750D Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L750D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $20
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback