Lenovo 5049A46

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 5049A46  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '16 at 04:53
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 135
56% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 133
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3077) 808MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2279
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.78
1% 1.09 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.44 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.0
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 96.9
Mixed 87.9
71% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.34
89% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR1810KC58E8F1333 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.2
18% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 5049A46 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 5049A46

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback