Today's hottest deals

Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 700Z3C/700Z5C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 700Z3C/700Z5C
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '19 at 23:20
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 122
58% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 177
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.06 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.94 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA13.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 374 355 184 141 104 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.4% Below average
Read 145
Write 64.2
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 241
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 7.9
28% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 156
139% 207 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 102%
ST2000DL 001-9VT156 2TB
1TB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 41 38 34 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 29.2
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 37
39% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 029E CMSA8GX3M1A1600C11 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.9% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700Z3C/700Z5C Builds (Compare 163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback