Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 103 2-Core 202 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 503 52% 421 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.3 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Lighting 67 Reflection 65.6 Parallax 91.4 55% 74.7 fps	MRender 66.1 Gravity 68.3 Splatting 54 51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 349 346 356 350 352 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 445 Mixed 405 SusWrite 353 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 66.1 4K Mixed 45 146% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 368 276% 368 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HU564403EP0200 8502 PSD34G160081 0707 HU564403EP0200 8502 PSD34G160081 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	62x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	57x
RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	38x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	29x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,464 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $335