Samsung 270E5G/270E5U

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Samsung 270E5G/270E5U (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP270E5G-XD1BR
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131029
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 03 '19 at 00:18
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	34%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 51.9 1-Core 63.5 2-Core 99.5 43% 71.6 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 149 20% 147 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 710M 2,241 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C736) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	3.98% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 5.54 Parallax 3.78 4% 4.74 fps	MRender 4.43 Gravity 4.67 Splatting 5.22 4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.98% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 57 110 4.3 27 110 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.6% Poor	Read 168 Write 96.5 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 99.6 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 5.9 31% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 15.8 DQ Write 16.9 DQ Mixed 15 12% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 287GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 63 53 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 47 Write 79 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 55.6 41% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 6.7 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 6.3 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 270E5G/270E5U Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 270E5G/270E5U

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	71x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	32x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	23x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	118x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	22x
GeForce 710MNvidiaBench 3%, 2,241 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
THNSFC128GBSJ 128GBToshibaBench 36%, 469 samples	3x

RAM
SH5641G8FJ8NWRNSQR 1x8GBSmartBench 28%, 1,144 samples	52x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	22x
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 1x4GBSmartBench 24%, 2,696 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16