Gigabyte Z390 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics90.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 UD  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '19 at 01:07
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$253
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 148
2-Core 297
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,105
101% 849 Pts
64-Core 1,118
69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$265
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.2% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 109
Parallax 113
95% 113 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 79.5
82% 103 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 99 107 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 466
Write 320
Mixed 335
SusWrite 130
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 34.1
133% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 102
130% 229 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 167 161 166 167 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 83
Write 137
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 165
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
511GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 75 79 80 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 98.8
Write 93
Mixed 53
SusWrite 76.7
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 62%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
677GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 75 79 80 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 78.3
Write 75.3
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 76.7
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 51%
WD Ext HDD 1021 2.5TB
2TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 34.8
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 36.6
46% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
WDC WD50 00BEKT-60KA9T0 500GB
466GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.2% Very poor
Read 37
Write 33.5
Mixed 30
SusWrite 20.2
40% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 18%
TOSHIBA MK5065GSX 500GB
466GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.6% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 34.5
Mixed 25
SusWrite 20
38% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.6% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 16.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 UD Builds (Compare 12,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 UD - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $718
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback