Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170623
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMar 05 '19 at 14:30
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 261
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 901
89% 728 Pts
64-Core 1172
72% 1172 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 99.9
Parallax 76.4
120% 108 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 95.2
Splatting 102
80% 97.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 105%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 301 74 71 75 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 434
Mixed 382
SusWrite 159
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 53.1
180% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
111GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 433 400 416 438 437 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 432
Mixed 376
SusWrite 423
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 54.4
187% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
197GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 305 306 306 306 305 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 437
Mixed 392
SusWrite 319
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 54.1
186% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 112%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40
463GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 129 130 130 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 92
Write 91.7
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 130
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40
294GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 136 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 146
Write 110
Mixed 91
SusWrite 136
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40
157GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 130 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 152
Write 114
Mixed 75
SusWrite 129
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 87%
WD Elements 750GB
18GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0.9 0.7 4.7 6.3 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 35
Write 35.5
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 3
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 62%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 1TB
17GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 121 96 96 97 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 108
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 103
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
198% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 64%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
349GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 40.7
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 42.1
49% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 45.5
MC Mixed 22.8
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 9.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $840
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback