Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20324

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20324  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO IdeaPad Flex10
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141113
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateAug 17 '16 at 18:24
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2840
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Memory 41.3
1-Core 19.1
2-Core 40.6
23% 33.7 Pts
4-Core 41.8
8-Core 42.1
6% 41.9 Pts
64-Core 42.7
3% 42.7 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3985) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.8% Terrible
Lighting 0.83
Reflection 1.04
Parallax 0.91
1% 0.93 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.8%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 242
Write 106
Mixed 139
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 12.1
51% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 57.8
DQ Write 26.2
DQ Mixed 18.3
20% 34.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 91%
Leef Ice 8GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Read 26.4
Write 6.45
Mixed 9.68
14% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.38
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.006
17% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5174BM0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 5.9
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20324 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20324

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback