Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141017
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 07 '19 at 22:59
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 149
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 298
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.16 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.04
1% 1.58 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 245 223 233 224 226 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 474
Write 465
Mixed 352
SusWrite 256
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 52.9
107% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 359
272% 366 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 124%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
82GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 51 46 45 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 89.2
Write 97.1
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 51
55% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
16GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 115 112 130 129 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 81.6
Write 85.9
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 121
54% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
15GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 124 175 162 166 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 144
Mixed 27.1
SusWrite 147
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
22GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 50 46 45 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 83.3
Write 113
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 51.1
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
14GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 106 107 101 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 146
Write 158
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 114
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
15GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 97 101 103 106 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 129
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 103
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F 859B CT25664BA160B.C16F 859B CT51264BA160B.C16F 859B CT25664BA160B.C16F 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $799
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback