PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Intel Thurley |
Motherboard | Liyang X58 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.5 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170611 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 08 '19 at 14:09 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5687
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
|
81.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7790
Sapphire(174B E254) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.1.2
|
21.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 130 128 52 91 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
225GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 127 127 127 128 MB/s
|
73.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 MXIC 25L3205 40GB
1333, 33 MHz
4096, 36864 MB
|
51.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 3x |
Xeon W3680Intel $180Bench 75%, 6,658 samples | 3x |
Xeon X5550IntelBench 67%, 1,065 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples | 3x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 2x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $580 |