AMD AOPW-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	AMD AOPW-PLUS (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD AOPW-PLUS
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180317
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '19 at 15:03
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 6386 SE 28 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	50% Above average	Memory 63.6 1-Core 55 2-Core 109 46% 75.9 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 354 33% 276 Pts	64-Core 627 39% 627 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.2% Below average	Lighting 40.3 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 41.8 33% 37.8 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 36.5 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Goodram C50 120GB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM06.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 177 179 180 182 182 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.9% Average	Read 213 Write 198 Mixed 150 SusWrite 179 42% 185 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 13.3 53% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 52.4 58% 97.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 71%
SanDisk Wireless Stick 32GB 326 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 3GB free, PID 55a9 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	0.75% Terrible	Read 2 Write 2.3 Mixed 2.2 SusWrite 2.1 3% 2.15 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 0.75% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-001.B00LF 2x8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.7% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 7.3 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AOPW-PLUS Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: AMD AOPW-PLUS

CPU
Opteron 6276AMDBench 44%, 50 samples	5x
Opteron 6376AMDBench 49%, 24 samples	3x
Opteron 6128 HEAMDBench 39%, 21 samples	3x

GPU
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	2x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	2x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	2x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	2x
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 960GBAMDBench 101%, 182 samples	1x

RAM
M393B1K70CH0-YH9 2x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 50 samples	2x
36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 2x16GBMicronBench 48%, 43 samples	2x
M393B2K70DMB-YH9 2x16GBSamsungBench 30%, 18 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $79

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16