Asus X79-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X79-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160202
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 09 '19 at 07:09
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 95.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 230
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 667
67% 544 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
EVGA(3842 2884) 3GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.4% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 82.8
53% 71.3 fps
MRender 79
Gravity 74.6
Splatting 51.6
54% 68.4 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,573
Write 4,264
Mixed 348
534% 2,395 MB/s
4K Read 187
4K Write 462
4K Mixed 32.1
568% 227 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 1,005
DQ Mixed 1,088
714% 816 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$134
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 145 147 146 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 141
Write 139
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 146
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 101%
WD Elements 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 32
Write 27.3
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 28.2
37% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 992071 (997071) 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.5% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 21.9
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 56
72% 56 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79-DELUXE Builds (Compare 538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X79-DELUXE - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $908
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback