Today's hottest deals

MSI A75MA-G55 (MS-7696)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7696
MotherboardMSI A75MA-G55 (MS-7696)  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '19 at 04:25
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3500 APU-$60
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 33
2-Core 59.2
40% 56 Pts
4-Core 68.9
8-Core 69
9% 68.9 Pts
64-Core 68.9
4% 68.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
MSI(1462 7696) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.03
3% 3.89 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.94 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
793GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 142 129 129 142 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 146
Write 146
Mixed 125
SusWrite 138
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75MA-G55 (MS-7696) Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A75MA-G55 (MS-7696)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback