| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Intel X79F (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181018 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 14 '19 at 13:01 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2643 0-$1,040
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
68.6%
Good
|
65% 113 Pts
|
48% 386 Pts
|
28% 454 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
|
51.5%
Above average
|
52% 66.1 fps
|
51% 63.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 233 236 238 238 237 MB/s
|
62.7%
Good
|
52% 232 MB/s
|
106% 34.5 MB/s
|
106% 138 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137
713GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 108 109 105 107 MB/s
|
60.2%
Good
|
67% 91.9 MB/s
|
178% 1.2 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
466GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 116 119 119 118 119 MB/s
|
69.1%
Good
|
77% 105 MB/s
|
176% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT125R7BFR8C 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
48.3%
Average
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
48% 83.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79F Builds (Compare 7 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel X79F
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 2x |
| Xeon E5-2609 0IntelBench 56%, 759 samples | 1x |
| Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 3x |
| GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 1x |
| GTX 580Nvidia $450Bench 23%, 15,395 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $157 |