Asus A7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus A7C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A7C
Memory0.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070213
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateAug 21 '16 at 04:47
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7200-$55
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
28.9% Poor
Memory 55.3
1-Core 22.6
2-Core 30.8
27% 36.2 Pts
4-Core 17.9
8-Core 17.3
2% 17.6 Pts
64-Core 35.3
2% 35.3 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon X1450
Asus(1043 1231) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.352.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.18% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.18%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB-$82
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SB4OC70P Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 39.1
Write 36.4
Mixed 35
28% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.2
55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 25%
Generic SS32G SD Card 32GB
17GB free
Firmware: 8.0
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Read 3.27
Write 6.48
Mixed 4.43
4% 4.73 MB/s
4K Read 2.21
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 1.18
250% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
9.54% Terrible
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.73 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A7C Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Asus A7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $18
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback