HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z6 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C6
Memory83.8 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 06:37
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4116
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 166
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 611
55% 465 Pts
64-Core 1,234
76% 1,234 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P6000
Nvidia(10DE 11A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1657 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 169
Parallax 184
99% 158 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 181
Splatting 122
113% 139 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 103%
Great: 128%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 785 516 510 502 490 478 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,667
Write 1,501
Mixed 888
SusWrite 547
257% 1,151 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 53.2
199% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 559
DQ Mixed 633
471% 626 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 189%
Great: 259%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
218GB free
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 854 634 633 632 634 641 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,634
Write 1,478
Mixed 888
SusWrite 671
261% 1,168 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 54.3
200% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 784
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 742
556% 741 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 200%
Great: 259%
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
217GB free
Firmware: E8FK11.L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 543 258 258 259 259 260 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 750
Write 847
Mixed 771
SusWrite 306
150% 668 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 37.9
140% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 693
DQ Write 591
DQ Mixed 587
455% 624 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 120%
Great: 141%
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
22GB free
Firmware: E8FK11.L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 738
Write 816
Mixed 730
170% 762 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 36.4
136% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 694
DQ Write 585
DQ Mixed 572
447% 617 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 141%
G-RAID 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 329 332 339 329 339 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 298
Write 312
Mixed 102
SusWrite 335
190% 262 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
170% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 181%
Great: 200%
Lacie Rugged USB-C 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 93
Write 100
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 102
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
189% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 69%
External RAID 6TB
1.5TB free, PID ce34
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 40.3
Write 41
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 41.3
56% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1 HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1 HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK 95GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 32767, 8192, 8192, 32767, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
130% Outstanding
MC Read 55.8
MC Write 50.3
MC Mixed 55.7
154% 53.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 9.2
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 130%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback