Asus X75VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X75VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X75VC
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130605
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 23:42
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 487
54% 427 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 14C7) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 4.57
Reflection 4.12
Parallax 3.31
4% 4 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 8.87
5% 5.94 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 195 214 217 205 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 437
Write 411
Mixed 314
SusWrite 236
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 33.2
106% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 338
261% 357 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
465GB free
Firmware: GS2ZC360
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 130 131 130 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 125
Write 133
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 130
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 72%
SDXC Card 256GB
238GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 17 17 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 18.3
Write 12.8
Mixed 11.6
SusWrite 17
20% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.4
167% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 24%
Intenso Alu Line 8GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 12 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 15.5
Write 0.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 11
9% 7.78 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264HZ-1G6D 1 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.5% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 10.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X75VC Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X75VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback