Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 766 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Memory 93.4 1-Core 80.3 2-Core 206 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 801 72% 606 Pts	64-Core 2,050 127% 2,050 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6391) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	125% Outstanding	Lighting 170 Reflection 198 Parallax 193 139% 187 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 174 Splatting 126 116% 143 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 64GB-$48 540 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1225G Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,790 Write 2,908 Mixed 2,836 637% 2,845 MB/s	4K Read 419 4K Write 326 4K Mixed 350 1,257% 365 MB/s	DQ Read 1,290 DQ Write 1,078 DQ Mixed 1201 895% 1,190 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 77%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 19 19 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	9.53% Terrible	Read 30 Write 15 Mixed 6.2 SusWrite 19.2 21% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.53% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK 8x16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 52.9 MC Write 35.4 MC Mixed 42.6 125% 43.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.5 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $335