Foxconn A74ML 3.0/A74ML-K 3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	24% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Foxconn A74ML 3.0/A74ML-K 3.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100430
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '19 at 15:26
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 220 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket 940, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Memory 73.2 1-Core 40.7 2-Core 78.9 43% 64.3 Pts	4-Core 80.3 8-Core 80.8 11% 80.6 Pts	64-Core 80.8 5% 80.8 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1300 685 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Gigabyte(1458 2148) 256MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 42 54 55 56 57 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24% Poor	Read 159 Write 32.9 Mixed 73 SusWrite 54.2 18% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 22.1 4K Mixed 9.5 42% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 18.4 DQ Write 65 DQ Mixed 14.9 19% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 86%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,229 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 394GB free Firmware: JC4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 55 55 56 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 81.1 Write 68 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 54 45% 60.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 64%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 64GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 59 70 72 72 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 72.4 Write 65.6 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 68.2 48% 64.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown JM1333KLN-8GK JM1333KLN-8GK 8GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 533, 533 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.3% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10.3 26% 9.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 94.2 42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A74ML 3.0/A74ML-K 3.0 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A74ML 3.0/A74ML-K 3.0

CPU
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	4x
Athlon II X4 645AMDBench 46%, 5,346 samples	3x
Athlon II X3 450AMD $80Bench 44%, 4,468 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	1x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	1x
X110 128GBSanDisk $89Bench 71%, 11,245 samples	1x
S600 240GBHPBench 67%, 1,240 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
M2F4G64CB8HG4N-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 26%, 118 samples	1x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16